Open main menu

Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki β

Changes

Sanhedrin

1,085 bytes added, 14 March
Grammarly
Sanhedrin, used to get hear decision decisions by a processround-table, of in which the wieser speak wiser spoke last.
==Sell Also==In South Africa, Nelson Mandela described similar process in his tribe":"My favourite pastime One of the ancient groups that used deliberation was listening to the tribal meetings “Sanhedrin“. The Sanhedrin were organizations of judges that were held at Mqhekezweniactive in the period of the second temple of Judea (from around the 2nd century BC till about 425 AC). Its name came from Greek, but they conducted their trials not as the ancient citizens of Athens conducted theirs. The Regent was advised Athenians used Galton's method for their trials by a group installing 201 to 1501 citizens who acted as judges. All the hundreds of wise men - ''citizens listen to both sides and then cast their votes. The Athenians, who probably had an intuition about Galton’s method to extract the amaphakathicrowd'' - who had great knowledge of s wisdom, asked their judges not to consult each other to avoid biased verdicts, but in reality, the history judges did consult each other and customs of our people, therefore, advanced biased answers.<br>:These meetings were my earliest lessons in democracyThe Sanhedrin approached judgment by another course. Every person had a chance They limited the number of judges to speak 3 in an open financial cases and honest way - even if it meant saying things against 23 to 71 judges in capital cases<ref>Tractate of Sanhedrin</ref>. They applied the Regentsynthesis approach to produce their verdict. The Regent convention was that after interrogating witnesses and seeing evidence, the most junior judge would keep quietstart offering justifications for the verdict. After him, the next judge in age will continue until the oldest and only at wisest will conclude. This procedure could have given the end of elders more time to learn from the meetingnewcomers and conceptualize more elaborate answers. Then after listening to everybody, would he talkall the judges voted on the verdict. His task was In this procedure, the newcomers could also have a chance to summarise give fresh propositions and, therefore, give the discussions and find points of agreement"group new insights<ref>Nelson Mandela[http://www.delib.org/blog/2012/10/23/synthesis/ from Tal Yaron, (1994) Long walk 2013, Two ways to freedomthe wisdom of the multitude: Mean and Synthesis, 80th bithday abridged edition, Nolwazi, London p. 6''delib-democaracy blog'']</ref>.
==Refernces==
[[category: decision making]]
[[category: deliberation]]
[[category: methods]]