3,072
edits
Changes
→The Challenges
===Our Mission===
The objective of this platform wiki-paper is to foster a culture that embraces the principles of deliberation and democratic decision-making, while also advancing the corresponding methodologies and [[https://delib.org/technology|technologies]]. In pursuit of this mission, we are formulating a comprehensive theory of deliberative democracy. This theory draws on insights from various interdisciplinary fields, including [[Epistemology|philosophy]], neuroscience, and the extensive literature on deliberative democracy within the social sciences.
<br>
==The Challenges==
===Definition of deliberation===
Deliberation is an [[organization|organizational]] collaborative decision-making process aiming at finding the organization's [[optimal course of action]] which will result in the best outcomes for the [[stakeholders]], using minimal resources of the organization. In deliberation, all members of the organization are considered equal, all relevant information is taken into account, and the information is validated (see more on [[Values of deliberative-democracy]]).
[[Values of deliberative-democracy|Read more...]]
=== Group-Personal Optimising ROI Selection Criterion for selecting options ===In choosing among competing alternatives, it becomes imperative to establish a framework for assessing and distinguishing superior solutions from inferior ones. This chapter undertakes the exploration of criteria employed by participants in the determination of the most favorable solution.
[[Personal Optimising ROI Selection Criterion]] (GPORSC)
===Deliberation-action cycle===
Although a valuable framework, deliberation does not guarantee foolproof outcomes in the quest for optimal solutions. In this chapter, we put forward a proposal aimed at enhancing the caliber of solutions put forth and chosen by participants.
[[deliberation-action cycle]]
==The Elements==