3,072
edits
Changes
→The Challenges
<p style="font-size: 200%; line-height: 1.3">''Deliberative Democracy WikiOn Deliberation</p><p style="font-size: 125%; line-height: 1.3">Theory and Practice on in Deliberative Democracy</p><p style="font-size: 90170%; line-height: 1.35">This wiki is part of the R&D efforts of the By [[httpuser://delib-democracy.org deliberative democracy institiuteWinSysop|Tal Yaron]]</p>
<br>
===Our Mission===
<p>'''Editing & Contributions''': If you want to help editing or writing in this wiki, please contact tal dot yaron at gmail dot com.</p>
==Introduction==
Deliberative democracy is a form of democracy democratic approach that places citizen deliberation at its core, emphasizing broad public involvement in which citzenry deliberation is central to decision-makingprocesses. It put high value on envolving larger parts of champions the poulation in decision making of the governing bodies. citizen idea that all citizens should have an equal voice and equal influence in the shaping of public solutions. It manifests that when making a public decisions, every option should be taken into account, even if it’s owners do not have much education in regardless of their level of expertise on the subject. The reason for This principle stems from the recognition that, is that every each citizen has her own interests a stake in the public decisiondecisions, and they may be influenced by the choices the decision body will makewhich can profoundly impact their lives.
However, letting the challenge arises when attempting to include every citizen participate in the discussion and influence the option taken by the publicdeliberative process, results in tedious as it can lead to lengthy and endless unwieldy meetings. Many citizens want individuals aspire to shape the solutioncontribute their perspectives, while many others want to propose their own unique solutions , or criticize the critique existing ideas brought to the table. Equal While noble in principle, this equal deliberation may be can become a very cumbersome process that takes huge amounts of energy laborious and time-consuming endeavor. If all the residents of For instance, granting each resident an equal say in a small town would have the same influence on the solutions proposed, the deliberation may take could extend deliberations for years. As the decision-making body of decision makers growsexpands, so do does the time and energy it takes required to make reach an equal equitable decision. Because Unfortunately, this protracted process can deter participation, ultimately undermining the goal of its tediousness many citizens prefer not to participate in it, therefore making equal deliberation null.
==The Challenges==
The deliberation process is fraught with substantial challenges, as it necessitates the meaningful engagement of diverse individuals in decision-making, all while meticulously accounting for each unique perspective. This chapter delves into the intricacies of these challenges. ===Values Definition of Deliberationdeliberation===Deliberation is an [[organization|organizational]] collaborative decision-making process aiming at finding the organization's [[optimal course of action]] which will result in the best outcomes for the [[stakeholders]], using minimal resources of the organization. In deliberation, all members of the organization are considered equal, all relevant information is taken into account, and the information is validated (see more on [[Values of deliberative-democracy]]).
[[Deliberation|Read more...]]
[[Values of deliberative-democracy|Read more...]]
===Challenges Personal Criterion for selecting options ===In choosing among competing alternatives, it becomes imperative to establish a framework for assessing and distinguishing superior solutions from inferior ones. This chapter undertakes the exploration of criteria employed by participants in deliberationthe determination of the most favorable solution.[[Personal Optimising ROI Selection Criterion]] (GPORSC)===Deliberation-action cycle===Although a valuable framework, deliberation does not guarantee foolproof outcomes in the quest for optimal solutions. In this chapter, we put forward a proposal aimed at enhancing the caliber of solutions put forth and chosen by participants. [[deliberation-action cycle]]
==The Elements==
To successfully understand deliberation, I we suggest that we first have to understand the elements of decision making. The elements are divided into several areas. The first area is the area of cognitive elements, which are the elements that interacts interact in the brain to facilitate a decision. Next is the area of the group in decision making - which elements are crucial for decision making in groups. Then comes the area of communication medium. In this area , we will describe the elements that influence the transformation of information between the group members. In the next areas, we will deal with the psychological, sociological and organizational elements. ===The epistemic elements of decision making===Every deliberation Is based on knowledge. Usually, participants don't possess the same body of knowledge and may defer by their worldviews. Therefore understanding how knowledge is built, Is essential for creating a coherent knowledge base for all participants. In this section, we will describe how knowledge is built, and how to corroborate it. [[The epistemic elements of decision making|Read more...]]
===The cognitive Logical elements of decision making===
The basic entities of decision making in a group, are her members. Every member that takes part in the decision, uses a cognitive process to gather information and make a decision. So, the first step in understanding deliberation is to describe these personal cognitive elements that members are using to make their decisions. When we will understand the personal cognitive elements, we will be able to start to understand the more complex interaction between the members.
[[The cognitive elements of decision making|read more...]]
[[neuropsychology elements in decision making|Read more]]
===Psychological Elements in decision making===
[[Psychological elements in decision making]]
===Group Elements in Decision Making===
Every deliberation takes place in the context of a group. The group settings and properties may have a large influence on the psychology of the members and the outcome of deliberation. Also, during deliberation, the group may change, as different stake-holders stakeholders find interest in the decision making. Understanding the factors that within the group and between the group and other-groups, is essential to understanding understand mastering of deliberation.
[[The group in decision making|Read more]]
[[medium in decision making|Read more]]
===Organizations Organizational Elements in Decision Making===
[[Organizations in Decision Making]]
==Processes==
[[General process of deliberation]]
===Face To Face===
====Personal Decision Making====
===Technologies of Deliberation===
[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1YBZLdNsGohGBjO5e7yrwOQx78IzCA6SNW6T14p15aKU/edit#gid=1660122072 Tech Platforms [Technologies for Civic-Participation - Public Versiondeliberation]].
==Concerns==Digital deliberative democracy can be hacked by foreign governments<ref>[[Delibhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10361146.2021.2023093?scroll=top&needAccess=true Dowling, M.-E. (2022). Foreign interference and digital democracy: is digital era governance putting Australia at risk? <i>Australian Journal of Political Science</i>, <i>0</i>(0), 1–16.org]]</ref>.
==See Also==